INVADER ZIM and the St. Valentine's Day Massacre! Post Game Thread TOWNIE WIN!!

[d2lover]

Lol, might as well forfeit the game then. I certainly wouldn't invite scum back into their thread.

Because I fear of inviting the wrong person

 

[d2lover]

Votes are current.

no, d2dc just voted on me

 

[Leopold Stotch]

no, d2dc just voted on me

Votes are current and up to date.

 

[Pyrotechnician]

Not to be that guy, but I don't think screenshots of your inbox/private messages should be allowed.

A discussion for post game at this point. But regardless.

 

[Pyrotechnician]

Votes are current and up to date.

So my vote and d2dc's vote on d2lover are invalid?

 

[D2DC]

Not to be that guy, but I don't think screenshots of your inbox/private messages should be allowed.

A discussion for post game at this point. But regardless.

I agree. But, the fact that he just volunteered that info, while not under any real pressure. Then, he says that he had already cleared it with Leo, meaning this was premeditated. Finally, the fact that you can selectively remove conversations from your inbox..

 

[D2DC]

So my vote and d2dc's vote on d2lover are invalid?

I know mine is not.

 

[Skjolde]

So my vote and d2dc's vote on d2lover are invalid?

Were yours invalid yesterday?

I wont be revealing my inbox out of principle.

 

[Leopold Stotch]

So my vote and d2dc's vote on d2lover are invalid?

You did vote and I forgot to write it down! Let me go look and browse.

 

[Leopold Stotch]

Current Vote Tally:

Pyrotechnician (d2lover)
d2lover (Pyrotechnician)

I believe it is current and correct now. My bad, y'all.

 

[d2lover]

So how you explain my first post

Vote: Gorny

(yes, I know, day1 spam)

still...

 

[Leopold Stotch]

So how you explain my first post


(yes, I know, day1 spam)

still...

It is correct.

 

[d2lover]

Also I asked Leo, because I seriously doubted that she was saying yes, and I didn't want to violate the intention of the rules, not the exact wording.

 

[D2DC]

So how you explain my first post


(yes, I know, day1 spam)

still...

You are gonna need a lot more evidence to balance out your inbox post than an inconsequential early D1 vote.

 

[d2lover]

If it doesn't prove anything as you say, because you can leave a conversation. Why I have to balance it out?

I was sick of Pyro, also I'd like to hear his explanation that follows "in a bit"

 

[Pyrotechnician]

If it doesn't prove anything as you say, because you can leave a conversation. Why I have to balance it out?

I was sick of Pyro, also I'd like to hear his explanation that follows "in a bit"

I'm not sure why you are sick of me.

Regardless, my reasoning for pursuing a vote on you was never in relation to any message activity you may or may not have had. Not once had I pointed to that as a reason to vote for you.

 

[d2lover]

I'm not sure why you are sick of me.

Regardless, my reasoning for pursuing a vote on you was never in relation to any message activity you may or may not have had. Not once had I pointed to that as a reason to vote for you.

Sorry if that came wrongly. I meant I was sick of you voting on me, not you as a person

 

[Pyrotechnician]

It is correct.

So apparently D2DC's vote is broken, but it wasn't broken yesterday.

Treestump or vote restricting ability?

 

[d2lover]

No, I'm in this game. Last night was date night for me and the Mrs. for valentines day, so if I spent too much time on the game she would obviously be angry with me.

Let me get caught up, but in regards to the vote train from yesterday I placed my vote on d2lover and it went in the complete opposite direction than I was expecting since I didn't check in again before days end. I'm chalking it up partially to trying to avoid a no lynch which I understand, but after doing a quick skim of the end of yesterday and today I think I'm still comfortable with where I was yesterday. I'll go back and explain my reasoning in a bit.

Vote: d2lover

 

[coju]

@d2lover yrs, why the inbox reveal?
@D2DC you revealed inbox to prove you could remove PMs?