Hmm interesting. Skjolde you noticed it too right?
Forgot to quote.Maybe? I'm getting some weird vibes, let's just leave it at that for now.
Hmm interesting. Skjolde you noticed it too right?
Forgot to quote.Maybe? I'm getting some weird vibes, let's just leave it at that for now.
I'm actually leaning towards a d1 lynch. Gonna try and explain when I get on the computer. Typing om phone sucksLynches move the game along. It’s a chance to net the dea agent.
I understand the hesitation to not. Especially since we don’t know who’s team lynched is hitting. Since there WitP doesn’t show allegiance: “All guards are revealed as Guard instead of Alpha Guard or Beta Guard. This is done to conceal who was guarding who to all layers until the game is over.”
Your thoughts were no d1 lynch?
From the wiki, the role the DEA is based on:I would be leaning towards lynching if we were sure that DEA has NK abilities
The least to expect is a NK ability from the DEA. The person basically has a kill on demand ability.You are the Anarchist. You have kill(s) you may use at any time during the game including at the time of your death. The number of kills you have is always equal to the number of Heirs currently alive in the game. If one Heir dies, you will lose one of your kills. No player is immune to kills. You win the game if Heir Alpha is dead and Heir Beta is dead. You don't have to be alive to win.
Hey Leo, do you support hard working Colombians providing a high demand product to the Americas? Is Robert DeNiro a hero or villain in Scarface?
But then you brought up a good observation if the DEA agent has investigation powers. A prolonged, stalled game would benefit him, as he could just check out each player each night until he finds a boss then use his NK.
I understand it as: he has <number of heirs> shots for the whole game (2 at start). If a heir is lynched, then he has now only one shot available.From the wiki, the role the DEA is based on:
The least to expect is a NK ability from the DEA. The person basically has a kill on demand ability.
And we are in perfect agreement. My response was trying to say that a NK is the least of our concerns. The DEA can use his 2 kills at any given point.I understand it as: he has <number of heirs> shots for the whole game (2 at start). If a heir is lynched, then he has now only one shot available.
Always this name, coming back and forth and again...Of course, I'm reading the wiki. D2DC may have altered this in many different ways.
that's good plan, do you start?I would be leaning towards lynching if we were sure that DEA has NK abilities.
IMO the double boss + DEA situation, with boss kill being a cartel kill, goes against:
- 1 chance out of 9 to hit the DEA
- 2 chances out of 9 to sweep half the board (!)
On top of that, bosses just can't defend themselves by revealing, as it would be of direct help for the DEA.
What can be revealed from a discussion? For real I don't see. So it must work in some other way.
We have to build a situation where DEA will be under much pressure...maybe having some sacrifice can be of interest...don't know.
Maybe claiming factions is our best bet to grab information: that will give a 5 vs 4 situation. Considering everyone but the DEA obviously answers rightfully, it gives an information on who the DEA can be amongst 5 instead of 9.
Your thoughts?
thank you thank you! A favorite movie when I was 18. I could never watch Scarface. it's. just... soo. lonnngggg. May have watched it once. It is a wild ride of a movie though.I think for now it is our best intrest to find the DErAt (a la coju spelling..... Why he's spelling it that way, idk! BTW, @coju, love your Johnny Depp Blow pic. Haven't seen that movie in a while but so good!) and then we all kill each other. But what info to share and what not to share is the question.... hmmm.....
If it seems valid for most, no problem with me starting.that's good plan, do you start?