[Game Thread] Narcos Mafia Game reboot - Medellín vs Cali Cartel

[coju]

____________________

 

[d2lover]

Story wise I'd think the former cartel member got tired or scared of the dangerous lifestyle of the narcotics trade and chose to be a snitch for the DEA. I highly doubt the snitch gets additional powers. The real danger is the information he knows, or has access to.


Why go for the tail when destroying the head kills the entire beast?

Did you have a revelation or did you want us to role claim just for fun?

No I don't want role claim, only party

can you quote the head, I forgot, good see!

 

[d2lover]

Unvote: Coju

 

[snickersnack]

 

[snickersnack]

Huh, I was trying to reply to @coju, but it wouldn't let me. Anyway, funny post.

 

[coju]

I hail from the lane down under!

Central time zone, Arkansas.

Snicker never said all.
He said on players. And this is not surprising. In fact, knowing what my own role PM said, I wouldn't even question a statement like that from Snicker.
Which makes me think about what your role pm might have said

The question was never answered. You asked again about the question so I clarified my question. I don’t wish to reveal too much about my pm, but who does?
… … …
Why are you coming to his defense so quick?
My defense was for a player who wasn’t here when there were other targets, everyone else, on a day where we knew nothing. Others thought so and voted accordingly.

My vote will go to snickersnack today more than likely.

My question to you both still stand.

 

[snickersnack]

The question was never answered.

Huh? Do you mean this:

Limited info?

 

[coju]

Huh? Do you mean this:

Si senior

 

[snickersnack]

Si senior

Okay.

You tried to get me to join you in lynching people who are afk. I declined, saying in effect that it's too early to treat anyone who I don't have info on as a partner. Then you start accusing people of being rats based on strained interpretations of their posts. Unless your role pm was *very* interesting, how would it be weird for someone to openly say they have limited info?

I think it's you who should answer that question.

 

[snickersnack]

Si senior

I'll also add that I thought your "question" was rhetorical given the post you made immediately after.

 

[Noodle]

Between zhao and Snickersnack, I can't really see a circumstance where coju is not worthy of being lynched. Sorry, man.

 

[snickersnack]

Limited info about all the other players?

I saw this, and then @Skjolde responded how I would have. Nice job twisting my words there.

 

[coju]

Okay.

You tried to get me to join you in lynching people who are afk. I declined, saying in effect that it's too early to treat anyone who I don't have info on as a partner.

You’re right about this. Early game banter.
We were the only two posting for a little while.

Then you start accusing people of being rats based on strained interpretations of their posts.

Yeah. We’re playing coked out drug lords looking for a rat, right?

Unless your role pm was *very* interesting, how would it be weird for someone to openly say they have limited info?

My role pm looked pretty generic. Just asking questions as we do.

I think it's you who should answer that question.

I’ll happily answer more and keep digging if that’s what you 4 want. But, again, I don’t see an answer.

 

[snickersnack]

An answer to what? "limited info?" isn't a question. Be direct, por favor.

 

[snickersnack]

I’ll happily answer more and keep digging if that’s what you 4 want. But, again, I don’t see an answer.

Now you're dodging a question.

 

[snickersnack]

Bed time for me. I'll read up tomorrow.

 

[coju]

... really? ???

No, I'm not town. I think you need to reread the initial post.

I'm not sure what your role pm said, but I have limited info on other players. If you know who all of your allies and enemies are, vote accordingly.

You have limited info on other players? How many players do you have information on? 1? 2? 7?

Now you're dodging a question.

Did I not answer it? Oh, I didn't say whether it was weird or not: It's not weird.
There.

Oh, and here:

Vote: snickersnack

I'm not going for short fries here, I'm going for the big boss. If I were the DErAt, I'd nk you instead of this discussion bringing eyes on me. There Noodle, that's a reason why.

Bed time for me. I'll read up tomorrow.

Same here.

 

[Babyhell]

Interesting talk, but well...for now it doesn't give me enough input to take a position.

I am more interested in having some more thinking about players with low talk - @Pyrotechnician, @Leopold Stotch, @Noodle, and even @d2lover who is more throwing votes than explaining things imo.

It is my position as of now...see you later!

 

[Babyhell]

Just to complete: because I saw in previous games that no/low talk usually gives a free pass/hiding during some days.

The other low talk is @Noodle, but granted that seems to be his playstyle anyway, waiting for information to be built, not sharing that much in the end, so I wouldn't overinterpret it for him.

But again, see first sentence of this post.

 

[d2lover]

Better saying nothing than spam?

I vote Pyro because Coju backed off from him.

Vote: Pyrotechnician